TrackerNano implementation #165
Conversation
cc/tracking/Trackers/TrackerNano.cc
Outdated
|
|
||
| #include "TrackerNano.h" | ||
|
|
||
| #if CV_VERSION_GREATER_EQUAL(3, 2, 0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Think the min value for the NanoTracker is 4.7.0
cc/tracking/Trackers/TrackerNano.cc
Outdated
| } | ||
|
|
||
| NAN_METHOD(TrackerNano::GetModel) { | ||
| // TBD |
|
-Check for OpenCV version 4.7 or greater
Done. |
|
ho nooooo !!!! Some checks were not successful |
Oh no! There was an issue with loading the model in the unit test. I have fixed it now. |
|
@UrielCh, it looks like the test "Use openCV from Brew / build (4, 22) (pull_request)" failed due to an unrelated system fault. Could you please run it again? |
|
all Tests pass, but the I still need to test mutiple openCV version. |
|
I still get some Stack trace whene I use TrackerNano. |
Did you try it using the official TrackerNano model files here? https://github.com/HonglinChu/SiamTrackers/tree/master/NanoTrack/models/nanotrackv2 |
|
I did some cleaning in the source tree moving all legacy tracker in a single file. |
|
you commit the 2 models: fdf592d3f946aa84775eecd1e388ab9f nanotrackv2/nanotrack_backbone_sim.onnx is there something wrong with the V3 ? could you please add an smple code in the "examples" folder ? by the way the |
I haven't tried the V3 models, but they should work just as well. I only included the V2 models so the tests run could run. |
|
could you please add an smple code in the "examples" folder ? by the way the Use the branch named 7.2.0 to make changes |
I have added bindings for using OpenCV's TrackerNano single object tracker, which is superior to any of the other available trackers (CSRT, MOSSE, TLD, etc.).
The changes allow a new TrackNano instance to be created by specifying the path of the backbone and neckhead model files in the "new cv.TrackerNano(backboneModelPath: String, neckheadModelPath)" constructor. All other methods, such as init and update, follow the convention and usage of the rest of the trackers.